EU Policies Hinder Chemical Industry's Net-Zero Transition

Published By DPRJ Universal | Published on Monday, 9 February 2026

A Renewable Carbon Initiative (RCI) report reveals significant EU policy barriers impeding Europe's chemical industry from achieving net-zero. Existing regulations, including ETS, RED III, PPWR, and SUPD, create a non-level playing field where bio-based products face stricter standards. Issues like investment uncertainty for carbon capture and utilization (CCU) due to sunset clauses, narrow definitions, and impractical implementation requirements collectively hinder the shift from fossil fuels to renewable carbon sources, underscoring a critical lack of comprehensive support for sustainable materials.

A recent report by the Renewable Carbon Initiative (RCI), titled 'Policy Barriers for Renewable Carbon Uptake,' highlights critical EU policy hurdles preventing Europe's chemical industry from achieving net-zero emissions. Despite political will to transition from fossil fuels, existing legislative frameworks like the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), and Single-Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) are inadvertently creating roadblocks.The report identifies ten specific policy challenges. A major concern is regulatory inconsistency, fostering a 'non-level playing field' where bio-based products face tougher sustainability verification than fossil-based alternatives. Subsidies for biofuels also distort feedstock markets for material applications. Investment in carbon capture and utilization (CCU) is jeopardized by sunset clauses that restrict the acknowledgment of fossil-derived COâ‚‚, creating misaligned investment timelines.Further obstacles include overly narrow definitions within ETS and PPWR, which exclude innovative renewable carbon products. For instance, the ETS disproportionately focuses on products lasting centuries, overlooking the circular replacement value of CCU. Misleading classifications, such as SUPD's exclusion of industrially produced, nature-identical polymers and PPWR's broad categorization of biodegradable plastics, add confusion. Impractical implementation requirements, like calculating minimum post-consumer recyclate content for individual plants, divert resources.The RCI emphasizes that the biggest barrier is the absence of a clear, comprehensive support framework with defined targets and incentives for renewable carbon materials. The report suggests revising restrictive definitions, tailoring rules for CCU feedstocks, reducing administrative complexity, and better aligning sustainability requirements across various carbon sources and applications to accelerate the industry's sustainable transition.