Mediation fails in IndiGo-Mahindra ‘6E’ trademark dispute; Delhi HC hearing set for Feb 2026
Mediation between IndiGo and Mahindra Electric over the '6E' trademark has failed, leading to a legal battle. The Delhi High Court has directed both parties to submit documents and prepare a joint schedule for the hearing on February 3, 2026. IndiGo alleges Mahindra's use of '6E' in its electric vehicle BE 6E infringes its trademark, while Mahindra contests the claim, citing different industry sectors.
The trademark dispute involves IndiGo Airlines and Mahindra Electric Automobile Ltd over the use of the '6E' mark. IndiGo, which uses the '6E' mark extensively in its branding and flight call signs, has registered the trademark under various classes related to transportation and advertising. Mahindra Electric chose 'BE 6E' for its electric SUV model, claiming the addition of 'BE' differentiates it and that it's a different industry (automobiles vs. airline services). Despite this, IndiGo filed a trademark infringement suit, arguing that Mahindra's use causes confusion and unlawfully exploits their trademark. Mediation to resolve the conflict failed, and the Delhi High Court has listed the case for admission, denial, and exhibit marking on February 3, 2026. Both parties have been instructed to submit photocopies of relevant documents and a joint schedule in preparation for the hearing. Mahindra also referenced a previous instance of Tata Motors objecting to the use of the IndiGo mark in unrelated sectors, questioning the consistency of IndiGo's objections. The case is set to determine the extent of trademark protection across different industry classes and the potential for consumer confusion between the airline’s and automaker’s brands.
